Solve for "I"..

I'm working on an equation to solve the "Donkey Factor" in poker, specifically no-limit Hold-Em..


I keep running into the same wall though... I'm finding it's virtually impossible to find a value for "I", when "I" = the Intelligence of the Donkey("D")..



Surely this is a critical missing piece of information that is essential to the outcome of the grand equation. Certainly, Poker players all over the world are pulling for me, either in secret or incognito or even subconsciously..i'm sure of it.



Like Einstein, who struggled with the values of Gravity and the Constance of the speed of light while solving for Relativity, I struggle to find, or even to understand, a consistant value that can be inserted into the equation for "I" when coupled with "D" ( I(D)~%pi...) that creates a solution.



It seems relative intelligence does not neccessarily translate into "I"ntelligence at the tables for the average player.

Not Neccessarily....could it then be (I(D)~%pi/NN(I)....)??



Fortunately, however, there is the world of Blogging, particularly poker Bloggers.

So with that being said, maybe "I" won't work as a value if the value must be representative of "Intelligence"..? Maybe, just maybe, "I" has to stand alone as a non-value,or 'zero' inherent and should then be just the obvious..

C'mon, anyone? Who's got it? Should i spell it out?
What happens to the equation if instead of "Intelligence" for "I" with a numerical value, "I" represents "zero" as in, "Idiot"...

im just sayin... ;) ( it's an inside link to another comment found somewhere in the blogger world...)